Archive for David Dimbleby

Five Ways To Improve BBC Question Time…

Posted in Politics with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 15, 2010 by eljmayes

BBC Question Time has been getting rather stale recently in my opinion, so here are five ideas that could help improve the format of the programme:-

Sack David Dimbleby- After sixteen years chairing the panel Dimbleby has become past his prime in both the political and fashion stakes (case in point- the “spider tie”). But who should replace him were he to leave? Huw Edwards, Jon Humphrys and Jeremy Paxman are all worthy candidates but I think the best fit at this time would be Jon Sopel. Sopel proved during the General Election campaign that he could chair discussions effectively as part of The Campaign Show nightly and when Parliament sits with The Politics Show. His antics in Rothbury earlier this year weren’t his finest hour however.

Move the start time to 9pm- David Attenborough looking at sea-horses in the Seychelles, Police car chases narrated by Jamie Theakston and period dramas starring Dame Judi Dench, these types of programmes cover noble subjects but are not as important as dicussing the issues of the week with those who are actually elected to (or oppose) the Government. Shifting Question Time to the more accessible time of 9pm would hopefully boost interest in politics and allow Andrew Neil, Diane Abbott (she isn’t winning the Labour Leadership folks) and Michael Portillo to get home at a reasonable hour if This Week was shifted to just after the BBC News.

Tape the programme the night before- Having the taping last two hours and editing it down to an hour instead of the “as live/one take” format employed at the moment would make the hour have no down time or inane rambling from audience members who wish to push their (sometimes bizarre) agenda.

Reduce the amount of panelists to four and reserve one seat for the minor parties- Four panelists instead of five would allow for more questions to be asked during the hour. As for the make-up of the four panelists, a Coalition representative, a Labour representative, a minor party representative (for example from The Green Party, English Democrats or a nationalist depending on location) and an editors pick of who could be outspoken/entertaining/controversial (more David Starkey than Ruth Lea) would be a solid panel.

Select politicians of equal standing in politics- Whilst I accept the BBC can only invite who the parties release to the broadcaster, the editors should try to pick politicians of equal standing. This would mean only ministers could only face off against shadow ministers, Lords could only face off against other Lords and Alistair Campbell could face off against no-one.

Advertisements

Cassetteboy vs. Nick Griffin…

Posted in Comedy, Politics with tags , , , , , on October 23, 2009 by eljmayes


Versus the majority of the country I would hope;). In all seriousness I thought that Griffin didn’t do as well as he would have liked- not helped by the fact that he had no pre-prepared soundbites to fall back on. The consequence of Griffin’s appearance on Question Time may cause a slight jump in the polls for the BNP in the short term, but I suspect that in the long term they will remain at the three percent mark nationally after the media storm has died down. This would mean that his party would face an uphill struggle to get a seat even in Essex, where his party plans to canvass heavily in next year’s General Election. Therefore it is my opinion that the status-quo will remain in regards to the support of the BNP in the next twelve months.

The Leaders’ Debate Format…

Posted in Broadcasting, Politics with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 30, 2009 by eljmayes

SkyNewsLeadersDebate

With Sky News still pursuing a leadership debate between the major parties it is time to give my opinion at what type of format they would take, who would be involved and what channels they would be broadcast on. I would suggest that there are three main debates on three different channels, all on terrestrial television. All three major parties would take part, so this means Gordon Brown from Labour, David Cameron from the Conservatives and Nick Clegg from the Liberal Democrats. The reason for including Clegg is simple, like it or not his party hold nearly ten percent of parliamentary seats, run numerous councils throughout Britain and his party could influence (directly or indirectly) who wins the election. The scheduling of such debates would be quite easy, say three consecutive Wednesday evenings at 8pm.

I would propose that the first debate takes place on the BBC, is near live (to have a safety mechanism for libelous comments) and is ninety minutes in length. A town hall format would be applied, with each leader getting two minutes to answer a question from the audience, plus a chance for a short rebuttal once all three leaders have spoken. Each question would have a designated period of ten minutes as not to dwell on one question too long. This format is basically a modified version of what the BBC broadcasts every week for Question Time but I would favour Jeremy Paxman over David Dimbleby to host as Paxman would be better at getting the leaders to give answers to the questions asked.

For the second debate I would propose a simple three leader debate on Channel Four, which is live and lasts for two hours inclusive of commercials. This would be a closed debate not in front of an audience where the questions would be asked by the host. The two minute plus rebuttals format of the first debate would remain, however the debate would allow the ability for topics to be covered in greater detail (for example the economy), with multiple questions being asked on the same subject punctuated by the commercial breaks. That would mean a total of five or six topics would be covered in total, which would be enough for all three leaders to set out their policies on the most important election issues. Jon Snow would host the debate as he is the recognized face of news on the channel.

The final debate would be a live head to head debate hosted by Sky News but simulcast as well on Five. Again it would last two hours inclusive of commercials, and would be an closed debate in front of an audience where the questions would be asked by the host. The running theme of two minute plus rebuttals would carry on as to provide continuity between the debates. The leaders would pair off against each other in half hour sections, with Cameron taking on Clegg first, then Brown taking on Clegg, and finally Brown taking on Cameron. Three questions would be asked in each section, with the public seeing how the leaders directly contrasted on their policy and their communication skills. Adam Boulton could host the debate, but in light of Brown’s distain at his questioning the day after his conference speech I would draft in Sir David Frost if he was available to appease Labour. Another possible host would be Alistair Stewart if ITV/ITN were prepared for to release him for the one off event.

A debate between the smaller parties should happen as well, if only on the internet or a free to air satellite channel such as Current TV. I would limit the amount of parties to five as any more would interrupt the flow of the debate. Regional debates should be held in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and screened as Question Time specials by the BBC to allow for maximum exposure.

Labour have suggested that the leaders of various departments should have their own debates, but clearly this would just be a ploy to get Alistair Darling to face off against George Osborne. I don’t feel a public desire to see this and it would create five or six extra debates, many of which few would actually take the time to watch.

It’s my personal opinion that if Brown decides that he wants to answer Sky News’ invitation to take part in a debate he will do it soon, especially if Labour are heavily behind in the polls. If he doesn’t reply before the election is called (likely sometime in March) then there will be no debates on the terrestrial channels. Sky News may go ahead but a debate without Brown could be in breach of electoral broadcasting law.

%d bloggers like this: